Which side makes a better case?
avatar
7 Comments
  • Filter by:
  • Pro
  • Draw
  • Con
  • 2 years ago

    @burnsstephen16 thanks for the debate! I'll look deeper into the article's you were talking about to see what the issue is with those conditions and things

  • 2 years ago

    THE SWAGGGG

  • 2 years ago

    For many homeless people, as long as they’re addicted to hard drugs , especially those who have been sedated for years, I don’t think any support, temporary or permanent, or even having a decent paying job, would do. I assume many would rather just feed their addiction on the street rather than have the opportunity to have a life, and this state unfortunately has everything to do with extreme drug addiction, not their lack of drive which perhaps they may have had

    Unless a full transition program is provided, where by permanent housing would ONLY be provided to those who are willing to undergo random drug testing, rehab, etc... or requirements of some sort , it wouldn’t work effectively in my opinion. Some and perhaps many would enter these permanent houses , already hooked on opioids ,’and would just get sedated in a house instead of the streets

    • 2 years ago

      As for Maslow hierarchy of needs, I think that hierarchy looks very different from an ordinary person compared to a biologically addicted person , who’s drive and fire to live totally diffused by chemicals that numb them all day ...