He does find it offensive. I actually got his thoughts directly on Twitter, though it could have been staffer
@cotter I think that might be your strongest argument. If he is upset by the description and can provide alternative language, I think the use of that alternative language should be strongly considered.
@madmike That's surprising to hear. I never even considered using that in my arguments.
This is a second round to a previous debate. forgot to mention that in the title. https://www.qallout.com/debate/5200-wikipedias-claim-that-ben-swann-has-repeatedly-spread-conspiracy-theories-and-fake-news-is-false-and-violates-several-of-its-own-policies-as-well-as-basic-human-decency