3 months ago
Vote to comment and see the results
avatar
3 Comments
  • Filter by:
  • Agree
  • Unsure
  • Disagree
  • 2 months ago

    Yep. He has flagrantly, repeatedly, and in some cases *openly* violated the Emoluments Clause of the Constitution. That's the kind of thing that Impeachment was pout int he Constitution FOR. If Congress won't use it for that, we might as well take it out of the Constitution. Two of the only three times it happened was for petty political reasons, and the one time it was legit, the guy resigned before he could be removed.

    • 2 months ago

      If every president before him didn't violate domestic and international law and get away with it then I'd say yes, but he's no worse than his predecessors.

      • a month ago

        I think he should be impeached for a very different reason: because his laywer is on record saying he purposefully & wilfully stole from small business owners prior to presidency, which I also heard from another indirect source.