Which side makes a better case?
avatar
10 Comments
  • Filter by:
  • Pro
  • Draw
  • Con
  • 4 months ago

    Dang didn't get my goodbye out, I didn't know it automatically ended like that. Anyway, good debate! It was really nice talking to you!

  • 4 months ago

    Thanks, @derekgeorgelight
    Nice chatting with you in your first debate. Hope you have many more enjoyable ones.

    • 3 months ago

      @nellyj_misesian I would really like your source of your claim that the Jews murdered babies on golden alters and used drums to drown out their screams. Seems like Christians are the ones with moral issues with such lies from their mouth holes. And maybe a heart full of hate as well. Go learn some real history please.

    • 3 months ago

      NO REPLY OF COURSE LOL!!!!

  • 4 months ago

    Atheism is a statement about the existence of gods, not morals. Not to say atheists don't have morals, but morals are mostly always personal.

    • 4 months ago

      @daniel_jongeward the point is that moral law requires a moral law giver who can only be God. so if you have no God you have no moral law giver and thus no moral law. Morals can't be personal or you could never decry the actions of another but yet I'm sure you do such as rape or murder.

    • 4 months ago

      @nellyj_misesian your just assuming there has to be a moral law giver the only way you can think of. Its the same argument that all lawful countries must have a king to give laws, well very few countries have a king, so where do the laws come from? Your argument is nonsense. There was never a god so there morals came from a cult leader anyways. It's not a great place to get ones morals.

    • 3 months ago

      @nellyj_misesian Prove that moral laws exist.